Presenting at Techdays 2009!

Still working out session details, but it looks like I will be presenting in Ottawa and Montreal for Techdays 2009.  I will be loitering around at the Toronto event soaking up all the techie-goodness, so come find me at any of the three events.  We can talk shop, shoot the breeze, or just mill about having a good time.

I promise I won’t embarrass anyone.  Except maybe myself.  But that’s a warning for all occasions.

Here are the dates of the events across Canada.  Buy your tickets before the early-bird deal runs out!

City Date Venue
VANCOUVER SEPTEMBER 14-15 Vancouver Convention Centre
TORONTO SEPTEMBER 29-30 Metro Toronto Convention Centre
HALIFAX NOVEMBER 2-3 World Trade & Convention Centre
CALGARY NOVEMBER 17-18 Calgary Stampede
MONTREAL DECEMBER 2-3 Mont-Royal Centre
OTTAWA DECEMBER 9-10 Hampton Inn & Convention Centre
WINNIPEG DECEMBER 15-16 Winnipeg Convention Centre

The Early Bird price is $299.  The regular Price is $599.

I will post more on the sessions I will be presenting at a later date when I get the full details.

See you there!

Make it Right: Revisited

In the previous post Make it Right I asked the question

Why aren’t more people making it right?

I was curious why people don’t take the time to write software properly.  There are lots of jokes about bad software development:

If houses were built the same way programmers build programs, we’d all be living on the street.

Unfortunately it’s a fair statement.  Most programs out there suck*.  I used to come back with the argument that people have been building houses for thousands of years, but software for only a few decades.  There are bound to be issues.  But then it occurred to me.

Mike Holmes is all about making it right, as I said in the previous post.  His TV show was about fixing the problems that professionals made.  Professionals who have been building the same thing people have built for thousands of years.  Wait a minute.  I just flawed my own argument.

Houses are built the same way programmers build programs.


I see three very apparent reasons.

  1. Cheapness – People want software built quickly, as cheap as possible.
  2. Laziness – Why strain your mental processing or follow best practices when you can just do whatever first comes to mind?
  3. Uneducated – Sometimes (a lot of times) the person doing the building/development just doesn’t know what they are doing.

There are numerous other reasons why, but these three are by far the biggest across all aspects of building stuff.  I think they answer the basic question asked earlier, but now I have another question.

Why do we let people who are lazy or uneducated build applications for us, just so we can save a few bucks?  We will end up paying loads more in support after the fact…

*I said programs, not programmers.

Make it Right

For the last couple months I’ve had a strange fascination with the TV show Holmes on Homes.  By no means am I construction-literate.  When I want something built with wood, I buy it.  The fascination is not about the construction, or even his manly good looks (FYI: I meant it in the friendly-way, not the friendly-way), but the premise of the show.

Mike Holmes is about doing a job right.  It doesn’t matter what the job is; it HAS to be done right.  Period.  No if’s, and’s, or but’s.  We need more people like him.

This applies to Information Technology as well.  Take the Security Development Lifecycle for example:

Do it right first: securing new code helps keep down compatibility and roll-out costs.

Why aren’t more people making it right?

Security, Architecture, and Common Sense

Good enough is sometimes not good enough.  I’ve been doing a lot of thinking lately (well, I’m always thinking), and security has been an issue that has come up a lot.  Frankly, I’m a two-bit software developer.  I know my code isn’t the best, nor the most secure.  I use strong passwords, encrypt my sensitive data, and try to limit access to the applications for those who need to use it.

In theory this works.  Problem is, it’s a lame theory.  There are so many unknown factors that have to be taken into account.  Often times they aren’t.

When I go to build an application I spend time designing it and architecting it.  This is usually the case for most developers.  What I’ve noticed though, is that I don’t spend time securing it.  I can’t.

Imagine building a house.  You put locks on the doors, bars on the windows, and someone breaks in.  Why?  Because someone left the key in the door.  You can’t build against that.  You just can’t.

You can follow the Security Development Lifecycle, which I recommend to each every single developer I meet.  There are tons of resources available.  But it can only go so far.  It’s designed more for being part of the iterative processes, not the architecture.  Or at least, that’s how most people interpret it.


My last post talked about Single Sign-On (SSO).  It’s a great sellable feature for any product.  What most people don’t realize though is the inherent security benefit to it.  With it, that means one less password to remember, one less password that could get intercepted, one less password to change every month.  This is a fundamental architectural issue.  But at the same time, it’s common sense.

What is sometimes the simplest idea, is usually the correct solution

What the hell does that mean?  It means keep it simple.  Security is simple.  Keep data from prying eyes, and keep it from getting lost.  This is common sense.

Security is not difficult to comprehend.  It becomes difficult when academics get involved.  Spouting theories and methodologies scares people into thinking security is extremely difficult to implement.  It’s not!

Follow the Data

Understanding the flow of data is crucial in properly architecting an application.  It’s crucial in properly securing an application as well.  SSO is a perfect example of this.

The SSO feature in Office SharePoint Server 2007 maps user credentials to back-end data systems. Using SSO, you can access data from server computers and services that are external to Office SharePoint Server 2007. From within Office SharePoint Server 2007 Web Parts, you can view, create, and change this data. The SSO feature ensures that:

  • User credentials are managed securely.

  • User permission levels that are configured on the external data source are enforced.

It makes perfect sense.  It’s simple when you think about, and it affects every subsystem of SharePoint.  Make security a feature.

This is interesting…


I’m fairly certain there’s a good reason for this, but I just thought it was interesting because these are not hashes.  They are actual encrypted passwords.  Statistically improbable to get something like this in production systems.  Completely understandable in development.  Just thought it was interesting to see.

What Makes us Want to Program? Part 4

In my previous post, I started talking about using Microsoft technologies over PHP and open source technologies.  There were a couple reasons why I chose to make the move.  First, from a development perspective, everything was object oriented.  PHP was just getting started with OOP at the time, and it wasn’t all that friendly.  Second, development time was generally cut in at least half, because of the built in controls of ASP.NET.  Third, the end result was a more rich application experience for the same reason.  The final reason comes down to the data aspect.

Pulling data from a database in PHP wasn’t easy to do.  The built in support was for MySQL, with very little, if next to nothing for SQL Server.  In a lot of cases that isn’t always a bad thing.  MySQL is free.  You can’t argue with that.  however, MySQL wasn’t what you would call ACID compliant.  Defined, MySQL did not have the characteristics of being Atomic, Consistent, Isolated, and Durable.  Essentially, when data goes missing, there is nothing you can do about it.  SQL Server on the other hand is very ACID compliant.  This is something you want.  Period.

Once .NET 2.0 was released, a whole new paradigm came into play for data in a web application.  It was easy to access!  No more, or at least next to very little boiler plate coding was necessary for data access now.  Talk about a selling point.  Especially when the developer in question is 16 going on 17.

Now that I didn’t need to worry about data access code, I could start working on figuring out SQL.  At the time t-SQL scared the crap out of me.  My brain just couldn’t work around datasets.  The idea of working with multiple pieces of data at once was foreign.  I understood single valued iterations.  A for loop made sense to me.  SELECTs and JOINs confused me.  Mind you, I didn’t start Statistics in math until the following year.  Did SQL help with statistics, or did statistics help me finally figure out SQL?  It’s a chicken and the egg paradox.

So here I am, 17 years old, understanding multiple languages, building dozens of applications, and attending developer conferences all the while managing my education in High School.  Sweet.  I have 3 years until the next release of Visual Studio comes out.  It was here that I figured I should probably start paying more attention in school.  It’s not so much that I wasn’t paying attention, it’s just that I didn’t care enough.  I put in just enough effort to skate through classes with a passing mark.  It was also at this point in time that I made an interesting supposition.

Experts tend to agree that people who are programming geniuses are also good at math and critical thinking or reasoning.  Not one or the other, but both.  Now I’m not saying I’m a programming genius, but I suck at math.  It was just never in the cards.  But, according to all those High School exams and the psychological profiling they gather from them, my Critical Thinking and Reasoning skills are excellent.  Top 10% in Canada according to the exam results.  My math skills sit around top 20-30% depending on the type.

Neurologists place this type of thinking in the left hemisphere of the brain.  The left brain is associated with verbal, logical, and analytical thinking. It excels in naming and categorizing things, symbolic abstraction, speech, reading, writing, arithmetic.  Those who live in the left brain are very linear.  Perfect for a software developer.

The supposition I made had more to do with the Pre-Frontal Cortex of the brain.  It does a lot of work, some of which is planning complex cognitive behaviors.  Behaviors like making a list, calculating numbers, abstracting thoughts, etc.  It plans out the processes our brains use to get things done.  This is true for both sides of the brain.  So, suppose you are left brain-oriented.  You are predisposed to be good at development.  Now, suppose your Pre-Frontal Cortex is very well developed, more so than the average person.  It could be reasoned that part of being a programming genius is having a well developed Pre-Frontal Cortex.

So why does this make us want to program?  Find out in Part 5.